Aaron Brown Law Offices

The way our legal system is set up, you only get one shot at getting what you are owed; there are no mulligans or do-overs. That is why it is so important that people with serious injuries choose a law firm with proven results.

While the majority of the cases we handle do end with a settlement, we prepare each and every case as if it were going to trial, and it shows in the results we obtain for our clients.

As the summaries below illustrate, when we tell insurance companies that we will fight for our clients in court if we can't reach a fair settlement, they know we mean it.

Recent Awards

January 2010

Ron B. v Drivers Management

Ron suffered a foot injury while trying to push rolltainers into a store. The Judge awarded weekly checks from the date of injury to date of trial and going forward, as well as the medical care necessary to treat his injury.

January 2010

Jason B. v Drivers Management and Werner Enterprises

The Judge awarded Jason lifetime weekly indemnity checks as well as future medical care for his back injury that occured when cargo fell on his back while he was unloading a trailer at a Dollar General store.

December 2009

Brad L. v Drivers Management

Brad blew out his knee while unloading a trailer. He was awarded weekly indemnity checks as well as medical care for his injury, including a total knee replacement.

July 2009

Roy J. v United Electrical Supply

Injury occured when Roy was moving reels of electrical wire and hurt his back. The Judge awarded weekly indemnity checks and the medical care necessary for his injury.

Did you know?

Nebraska is home to hundreds of trucking companies, including two of our country's largest. Because of this, a lot of trucking related litigation takes place in our state.

Let us put our experience to use for you. We have represented clients from Florida up to Maine, from Washington down to Nevada, and most states in between.

The summaries to the left are recent cases we won in Court and do not include settlements.

Because every case has unique facts and circumstances, you should not infer from these past cases that your case will result in the same outcome.